Reaping the benefits of marriage equality

Same sex couples have more than marriage equality to be thankful for with the recent United States Supreme court ruling – it also comes with financial benefits that can save them thousands of dollars on taxes.

When gay or lesbian couples marry, they will now be able to enjoy the rights and benefits experienced by any other couple. Depending on the income between the two individuals, their taxes could go up or down.

As an example, a person earning $70,000 and his partner $30,000, will have their tax bracket falling at $19,000 if filed separately vs. $12,000 if filed jointly. There may be instances where the joint filing brings them to pay higher taxes, but other social insurance and medical benefits will offset the disadvantage.

John Singh and Jeff Watson have been domestic partners for 12 years, and they could not get any happier than the opportunities opened for them. The IRS now recognizes California same-sex marriages and is already allowing these couples to file taxes jointly.

Before the ruling on the Defense of Marriage Act, same sex couples could only file taxes as domestic partners which only confused the IRS.  Once, Jeff Watson received notices from the IRS informing him of thousands of debt in self-employment taxes. But he wasn’t self-employed – his partner Jeff Singh was.

To date, specifics on joint filing of taxes are still being worked on by the federal government. As Jeff Watson pointed out, “once we have more clarity on that, we’ll probably be able to make a more informed decision.”

Share

Be the first to comment - What do you think?
Posted by Taxmaster - December 5, 2013 at 12:41 am

Categories: Federal Tax, Tax Law   Tags:

Apple – “Think” Taxes

Tech giant Apple is on the hot seat again for apparently paying nothing for corporation taxes for its UK subsidiaries in 2012.

According to the corporate results filed by the company, its two subsidiaries made pre-tax profits of around 60 million pounds, and sales of over 1 billion pounds combined. So why the company pay zero in taxes?

According to Forbes, there are three things to consider before allegations are made against the company.

First, iTunes sales are made in Luxembourg as VAT rates are lower. Furthermore, the EU tax law itself states that “electronic services” pay taxes in the country they come from and not the country where the service is delivered. For physical services or items, the rate will follow the place of delivery. So in the case of iTunes’ digital downloads, all the taxes will be settled in Luxembourg even if the recipient is in the UK.

Second, Apple being a global company, has its business structured strategically. Apple purchases its materials from China via an Irish company which will then sell the products to different dealers and Apple stores all over the world. The profits earned by the Irish company will are taxed in Ireland – although in Ireland, taxes only need to be paid if the transaction took place within the country – so no taxes need to be paid.

Finally, operating profits are not subject to taxes in the UK. What are taxed are the profits before tax. What the company does is that it issues stocks to the management as part of their pay. Expenses due to employee pay are deducted from pre-tax profits, and only then will they be only to calculate the taxes due.

While there is nothing illegal about what Apple is doing as far as its taxes as concerned, it all seems dodgy and a little discomforting for some. After all – Apple’s signature is to “Think” – and so there is actually no surprise to the company’s creativity in managing its finances.

Share

Be the first to comment - What do you think?
Posted by Taxmaster - December 1, 2013 at 12:40 am

Categories: Federal Tax, Income Tax, State Tax   Tags:

Still High Taxes in Hoboken City Despite 1.9% City Property Tax Cut

Property owners of Hoboken City may still be expecting high taxes even after the city council approved the 104.8-million-dollar municipal budget, a means to lower taxes on city property by 1.9%. Apparently, the 1.9-percent tax deduction isn’t enough to offset the 9-percent hike on taxes.

The city council approved the municipal budget recently. Jennifer Giattino, a councilwoman, voted against it, but her sole vote lost to the approving seven. Her disagreement arose from what she reckons as issues in funding a number of programs included in the initial budget. When the state approves the budget, the Hudson County tax board shall set the levy and consequently send tax bills to local property owners.

So what happens is if you have a $145,000 property, the municipal tax for that would now be $2,435, instead of $2,482.

Juan Melli, city spokesman, said they need the certified tax rate from the county so they could ascertain how the country budget will affect the property owners of Hoboken. The Hudson Country freeholders have adopted a 495-million-dollar budget for 2013, suggesting a rise in Hoboken’s taxes by 8.8%.

It’s clear that the property taxes in many municipalities in New Jersey have increased. However, Mayor Dawn Zimmer implied that their new budget should reduce municipal taxes by more or less 10%. Zimmer disagrees with the city council’s decision to put off key projects, but he thinks it is consistent with the budget his administration proposed earlier this year.

The city council has to postpone some of Mayor Zimmer’s proposed projects to cut back on expenditure. Included in the deferred plans are 9/11 Memorial, pedestrian safety improvements, and flood rescue vehicles.

 

Share

Be the first to comment - What do you think?
Posted by Taxmaster - November 30, 2013 at 12:38 am

Categories: Federal Tax, Income Tax, State Tax   Tags:

« Previous PageNext Page »

 Baker Mayfield Authentic Jersey