Reinvent the Tax Code

5With the fiscal cliff looming and tax hikes on the inevitable rise it would seem that the most rational solution would be to revise the tax code rather than raise taxes.  Now policymakers are trying to decide on whether or not they should extend 100% of the tax cuts or only 98% for a majority of Americans.

As a result of the fall elections President Obama has been insistent that we should raise taxes on the wealthiest of the American population, or those making $250,000 dollars a year or more. Republicans are completely soured by the idea of breaking their precious “no new tax” pledge to Grover Norquist. Republicans are stuck on the idea that if the wealthy pay a dime more in taxes then they have to they will stall the economy, lay off their employees, and screw the American people over in any way they can. They insist that taking away entitlements from the middle class and poor is the only way to fix this mess…even though the rich pay lower taxes than the middle class and poor and could easily afford it.

Nobody, I mean nobody, Republican or Democrat, is talking about reforming the tax code to make it fairer to the population. I mean a lot of the wealthy exploit loopholes in taxes to negate paying their fair share. This would only seem fair as the tax code is rigged so that only the very wealthiest can take full advantage of the loopholes.

Tax reform is a great option. But with a tax serviced based economy and the entire branch of the IRS being dependent on a complex tax code

Is this the right approach?

There was an attempt to fix all of these loopholes and deductions by implementing the 1986 Tax Reform Act. This act was passed in good faith but it didn’t work. Eventually the tax loopholes and deductions slowly crept in as lobbyists made their way to Capital Hill.

So what if we fixed the tax code by closing loopholes and eliminating deductions we could lower tax rates on the different income brackets. Also we would have a simpler tax code that will make taxes easier to understand and simpler to pay. Also this may encourage businesses to engage in better corporate behavior as they won’t have an incentive to exploit the tax code for their own gain. This will also lead to an overall sense of fairness amongst all individuals.

Wouldn’t this simple solution bypass all of the nagging and stonewalling in congress and make everything a bit easier for all of us? I sure would enjoy it. Wouldn’t you?

 

Share

Be the first to comment - What do you think?
Posted by Taxmaster - December 12, 2012 at 4:59 am

Categories: Federal Tax, Income Tax, Tax Law   Tags: , , , , , ,

Google’s tax Gaggle

The world’s most well renowned and profitable company, Google,  avoided paying $2 billion dollars in taxes around the world by utilizing Bermuda tax shelters. This amount is double than what the company paid a few years before. This growing trend among the wealthiest of companies isn’t helping solve the global financial crisis that lies before us. By using legal loopholes to funnel profits into tax sheltered havens, Google skirts paying corporate income tax. This results in a 50% reduction of their overall tax rate. With the success of this approach it’s no wonder Google shift 80% of its pretax profit into these shelters protecting its income from the hands of federales.

This recent finding could result in global outrage from this wealthy elephant in the room. Known as tax dodging these taxes are completely legal…for the time being. Now many countries including US, France, United Kingdom, Italy and Australia are beginning to take notice. Especially since the economic crisis that shook the world.

 

Just recently, EU’s executive body advised its member board to take a stand against these abuses by passing new legislation banning the use of tax havens. In Europe alone this accounts to $1.3 trillion dollars in forfeited revenue per year. This avoidance is “scandalous” and “an attack on the fundamental principle of fairness,” said Algirdas Semeta, the European Commission’s taxation commissioner.

“The tax strategy of Google and other multinationals is a deep embarrassment to governments around Europe,” said Richard Murphy, director of Tax Research in England. “The political awareness now being created in the U.K., and to a lesser degree elsewhere in Europe, is: It’s us or them. People understand that if Google doesn’t pay, somebody else has to pay or services get cut.”

So what is Google’s defense to this claim? Google, like other wealthy elite insist that they are abiding by all the tax rules relevant to them. Also they claim that their investment in the various countries is enough to bolster their economies. They also claim that they employ over 2,000 people in the UK alone that helps fuel the supply chain resulting in tens of thousands of new jobs.

The corporate search giant has avoided paying its share of  billions of dollars in global taxes using a pair of tax shelter strategies known as the Double Irish and Dutch Sandwich. The strategy, which is 100% legal, moves pretax income to subsidies located in Netherlands and Ireland which are then moved to a Bermuda  tax shelter. This tactic allowed Google to pay just 3.2% of its profit that it earned overseas, even though those tax rates ranged from 26-34%.

So what does America think of this? Senator Carl Levin a democrat from Michigan called out the tech industry for moving billions of dollars of profit overseas and thus not contributing to the American economy. Levin is attempting to champion legislation that deters outlandish tax abuses. Levin estimates that US global companies have over $1.5 trillion dollars in accounts outside of the United States. This amounts to over 60% of their cash holdings.

In the UK company execs were drilled as to why they don’t pay more taxes there. Google claimed that it paid taxes where it creates “economic value” or the United States

Still we have to wonder here in the states how much of these taxes we aren’t seeing. It seems silly for you or I to make any more sacrifices so that Google can retain its history of windfall profits.

 

 

Share

Be the first to comment - What do you think?
Posted by Taxmaster - December 11, 2012 at 4:58 am

Categories: Federal Tax, Income Tax   Tags: , , , , ,

A gloomy outlook

With the fiscal cliff looming tax hikes on the wealthy are becoming more and more popular. One by one the Republican rank and file cower to the might hand of the popular vote until tax hikes on the wealthy become a reality. But what happens next?
Tax hikes will take into effect on the wealthiest of Americans and as a result they will no longer be interested in making money. They will sell all of their goods and assets and give up their wine and caviar. Their fancy cars, houses, and boats will be sold for pennies on the dollar to avoid paying any more taxes. The servants, errand boys, pool boys, and yes men of the wealthy will find themselves unemployed. All of the brands that you love will no longer be produced because taxes are too high for the wealthy to want to become independently wealthy. The once elite will now fall into the ranks of the blurred anonymity that is society. No one will prosper and we will all wallow in our demise. Because their is no incentive to make money the economy will stagnate and unemployment will skyrocket. We will truly follow the way of Greece. The political framework will slowly collapse as political supplemental incomes will dry up to nothing. Populations will explode because there are no wars to keep them under control. The world as we know it will end. Paris Hilton and Justin Beiber will be left to begging for their meals. All because now the wealthy have to pay taxes equal to 98% of the world. Hard to believe? I think so.

Taxes will rise on the wealthy and the world will still go around. Nothing will change except the balance of power may be shifted a bit more in the common man’s favor. If you are ignorant to believe that by asking the rich to pay their fair share the world will end you have been drinking too much kool aid.

Share

Be the first to comment - What do you think?
Posted by Taxmaster - December 11, 2012 at 1:58 am

Categories: Federal Tax, Income Tax, Tax Law   Tags: , , , , , ,

« Previous PageNext Page »

 Baker Mayfield Authentic Jersey